Systems Neuroscience and Complexity

This video is part of the SNAC seminar series organized by Mac Shine, Joe Lizier, Ben Fulcher, and Eli Muller (The University of Sydney). Ian Shih is a Professor and Vice-Chair for Research in the Department of Neurology and Director of the Center for Animal MRI at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In this talk titled 'SORDINO for Silent, Sensitive, Specific, and Artifact-Resisting MRI', he covers his group's recent work introducing a novel fMRI approach that addresses issues ranging from motion artifacts to field inhomogeneity to sensitivity limitations for imaging awake, behaving mice. Link to the preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.03.10.642406v1

Golia Shafiei, from Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania. Part of the SNAC seminar series at Sydney University

Being Disconnected, But Remaining Vigilant: the neuroscience of opposing sleep functions

Localisation of Seizure Onset Zone in Epilepsy Using Time Series Analysis of Intracranial Data There are over 30 million people with drug-resistant epilepsy worldwide. When neuroimaging and non-invasive neural recordings fail to localise seizure onset zones (SOZ), intracranial recordings become the best chance for localisation and seizure-freedom in those patients. However, intracranial neural activities remain hard to visually discriminate across recording channels, which limits the success of intracranial visual investigations. In this presentation, I present methods which quantify intracranial neural time series and combine them with explainable machine learning algorithms to localise the SOZ in the epileptic brain. I present the potentials and limitations of our methods in the localisation of SOZ in epilepsy providing insights for future research in this area.

A recording of our seminar https://www.world-wide.org/seminar/9688/ Abstract: Understanding how macroscale brain dynamics are shaped by microscale mechanisms is crucial in neuroscience. We investigate this relationship in animal models by directly manipulating cellular properties and measuring whole-brain responses using resting-state fMRI. Specifically, we explore the impact of chemogenetically neuromodulating D1 medium spiny neurons in the dorsomedial caudate putamen (CPdm) on BOLD dynamics within a striato-thalamo-cortical circuit in mice. Our findings indicate that CPdm neuromodulation alters BOLD dynamics in thalamic subregions projecting to the dorsomedial striatum, influencing both local and inter-regional connectivity in cortical areas. This study contributes to understanding structure–function relationships in shaping inter-regional communication between subcortical and cortical levels.

A central question in neuroscience is how the structure of brain circuits determines their activity and function. To explore this systematically, we developed a 230,000-neuron model of mouse primary visual cortex (area V1). The model integrates a broad array of experimental data: Distribution and morpho-electric properties of different neuron types in V1; Connection probabilities, synaptic weights, axonal delays, and dendritic targeting rules; And a representation of visual inputs into V1 from the lateral geniculate nucleus. Simulations of neural activity in the model match experimental recordings in vivo on a number of metrics, such as firing rates, direction selectivity, and others. We will discuss applications of our V1 model at different levels of resolution to problems of broad interest: Understanding how architecture of brain circuit gives rise to the observed functional activity; Learning of behavioral and computational tasks in biological and artificial networks; Generation of the extracellular electric potential due to synaptic activity in the cortex. The model is shared freely with the community via brain-map.org, as are the datasets it is based on.

Investigations into the neural basis of conscious perception span multiple scales and levels of analysis. There is, however, a theoretical and methodological gap between advances made at the microscopic scale in animal models and those made at the macroscopic scale in human cognitive neuroscience that places a fundamental limit on our understanding of the neurobiological basis of consciousness. Here, we use computational modelling to bridge this gap. Specifically, we show that the same mechanism that underlies threshold detection in mice - apical dendrite mediated burst firing in thick-tufted layer V pyramidal neurons - determines perceptual dominance in a thalamocortical model of binocular rivalry - a staple task in the cognitive neuroscience of consciousness. The model conforms to the constraints imposed by decades of previous research into binocular rivalry and generalises to the more sophisticated rivalry tasks studied in humans generating novel, testable, explanations of the role of expectation and attention in rivalry. Our model, therefore, provides an empirically-tractable bridge between cellular-level mechanisms and conscious perception.

Talk by Eli Muller (The University of Sydney). Abstract: The neurobiological mechanisms of arousal and anesthesia remain poorly understood. Recent evidence highlights the key role of interactions between the cerebral cortex and the diffusely projecting matrix thalamic nuclei. Here, we interrogate these processes in a whole-brain corticothalamic neural mass model endowed with targeted and diffusely projecting thalamocortical nuclei inferred from empirical data. This model captures key features seen in propofol anesthesia, including diminished network integration, lowered state diversity, impaired susceptibility to perturbation, and decreased corticocortical coherence. Collectively, these signatures reflect a suppression of information transfer across the cerebral cortex. We recover these signatures of conscious arousal by selectively stimulating the matrix thalamus, recapitulating empirical results in macaque, as well as wake-like information processing states that reflect the thalamic modulation of largescale cortical attractor dynamics. Our results highlight the role of matrix thalamocortical projections in shaping many features of complex cortical dynamics to facilitate the unique communication states supporting conscious awareness.

Spontaneous behavior in different individuals can be decomposed and understood using a relatively small number of neurobehavioral modules—the compositional modes—and elucidate a compositional neural basis of behavior.

How can the lumbosacral organ provide the remarkable head stabilisation abilities unique to birds.

Abstract: Repetitive spatiotemporal patterns in resting-state brain activities have been widely observed in various species and regions, such as rat and cat visual cortices. Since they resemble the preceding brain activities during tasks, they are assumed to reflect past experiences embedded in neuronal circuits. Moreover, spatiotemporal patterns involving whole-brain activities may also reflect a process that integrates information distributed over the entire brain, such as motor and visual information. Therefore, revealing such patterns may elucidate how the information is integrated to generate consciousness. In this talk, I will introduce our proposed method to estimate repetitive spatiotemporal patterns from resting-state brain activity data and show the spatiotemporal patterns estimated from human resting-state magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) data. Our analyses suggest that the patterns involved whole-brain propagating activities that reflected a process to integrate the information distributed over frequencies and networks. I will also introduce our current attempt to reveal signal flows and their roles in the spatiotemporal patterns using a big dataset. - Takeda et al., Estimating repetitive spatiotemporal patterns from resting-state brain activity data. NeuroImage (2016); 133:251-65. - Takeda et al., Whole-brain propagating patterns in human resting-state brain activities. NeuroImage (2021); 245:118711.

This video is part of the SNAC seminar series organized by Mac Shine, Joe Lizier, and Ben Fulcher (The University of Sydney). Abstract: Cortical variations in cytoarchitecture form a sensory-fugal axis that shapes regional profiles of extrinsic connectivity and is thought to guide signal propagation and integration across the cortical hierarchy. While neuroimaging work has shown that this axis constrains local properties of the human connectome, it remains unclear whether it also shapes the asymmetric signaling that arises from higher-order topology. Here, we used network control theory to examine the amount of energy required to propagate dynamics across the sensory-fugal axis. Our results revealed an asymmetry in this energy, indicating that bottom-up transitions were easier to complete compared to top-down. Supporting analyses demonstrated that asymmetries were underpinned by a connectome topology that is wired to support efficient bottom-up signaling. Lastly, we found that asymmetries correlated with differences in communicability and intrinsic neuronal time scales and lessened throughout youth. Our results show that cortical variation in cytoarchitecture may guide the formation of macroscopic connectome topology.

A major challenge for causal inference from time-series data is the trade-off between computational feasibility and accuracy. Motivated by process motifs for lagged covariance in an autoregressive model with slow mean-reversion, we propose to infer networks of causal relations via pairwise edge measure (PEMs) that one can easily compute from lagged correlation matrices. Motivated by contributions of process motifs to covariance and lagged variance, we formulate two PEMs that correct for confounding factors and for reverse causation. To demonstrate the performance of our PEMs, we consider network interference from simulations of linear stochastic processes, and we show that our proposed PEMs can infer networks accurately and efficiently. Specifically, for slightly autocorrelated time-series data, our approach achieves accuracies higher than or similar to Granger causality, transfer entropy, and convergent crossmapping -- but with much shorter computation time than possible with any of these methods. Our fast and accurate PEMs are easy-to-implement methods for network inference with a clear theoretical underpinning. They provide promising alternatives to current paradigms for the inference of linear models from time-series data, including Granger causality, vector-autoregression, and sparse inverse covariance estimation.

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has yielded seemingly disparate insights into large-scale organiza-tion of the human brain. The brain’s large-scale organization can be divided into two broad categories: zero-lag representations of functional connectivity structure and time-lag representations of traveling wave or propagation structure. In this study, we sought to unify observed phenomena across these two categories in the form of three low-frequency spatiotemporal patterns composed of a mixture of standing and traveling wave dynamics. We showed that a range of empirical phenomena, including functional connectivity gradients, the task-positive/task-negative anti-correlation pattern, the global signal, time-lag propaga-tion patterns, the quasiperiodic pattern and the functional connectome network structure, are manifestations of these three spatiotemporal patterns. These patterns account for much of the global spatial structure that underlies functional connectivity analyses and unifies phenomena in resting-state functional MRI previously thought distinct. Paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-022-01118-1

Neuronal network computation and computation by avalanche supporting networks are of interest to the fields of physics, computer science (computation theory as well as statistical or machine learning) and neuroscience. Here we show that computation of complex Boolean functions arises spontaneously in threshold networks as a function of connectivity and antagonism (inhibition), computed by logic automata (motifs) in the form of computational cascades. We explain the emergent inverse relationship between the computational complexity of the motifs and their rank-ordering by function probabilities due to motifs, and its relationship to symmetry in function space. We also show that the optimal fraction of inhibition observed here supports results in computational neuroscience, relating to optimal information processing.

Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified multiple disease-associated genetic variations across different psychiatric dis-orders raising the question of how these genetic variants relate to the corresponding pharmacological treatments. Here we investigated whether functional information from a range of open bioinformatics datasets can elucidate the relationship between GWAS-identified genetic variation and the genes targeted by current drugs for psychiatric disorders.

Recent theoretical work has provided a basic understanding of signal propagation in networks of spiking neurons, but mechanisms for gating and controlling these signals have not been investigated previously. Here we introduce an idea for the gating of multiple signals in cortical networks that combines principles of signal propagation with aspects of balanced networks. Specifically, we studied networks in which incoming excitatory signals are normally cancelled by locally evoked inhibition, leaving the targeted layer unresponsive. Transmission can be gated ‘on’ by modulating excitatory and inhibitory gains to upset this detailed balance. We illustrate gating through detailed balance in large networks of integrate-and-fire neurons. We show successful gating of multiple signals and study failure modes that produce effects reminiscent of clinically observed pathologies. Provided that the individual signals are detectable, detailed balance has a large capacity for gating multiple signals.

It was long hypothesized that natural systems might take advantage of the extended temporal and spatial correlations close to the critical point to improve their computational capabilities. However, on the other side, different distances to criticality were inferred from the recordings of nervous systems. In my talk, I discuss how including additional constraints on the processing time can shift the optimal operating point of the recurrent networks. Moreover, the data from the visual cortex of the monkeys during the attentional task indicate that they flexibly change the closeness to the critical point of the local activity. Overall it suggests that, as we would expect from common sense, the optimal state depends on the task at hand, and the brain adapts to it in a local and fast manner.

Sensory systems reliably process incoming stimuli in spite of changes in context. Most recent models accredit this context invariance to an extraction of increasingly complex sensory features in hierarchical feedforward networks. Here, we study how context-invariant representations can be established by feedback rather than feedforward processing. We show that feedforward neural networks modulated by feedback can dynamically generate invariant sensory representations. The required feedback can be implemented as a slow and spatially diffuse gain modulation. The invariance is not present on the level of individual neurons, but emerges only on the population level. Mechanistically, the feedback modulation dynamically reorients the manifold of neural activity and thereby maintains an invariant neural subspace in spite of contextual variations. Our results highlight the importance of population-level analyses for understanding the role of feedback in flexible sensory processing.

Talk by George Paxinos, Scientia Professor of Medical Sciences at Neuroscience Research Australia and The University of New South Wales in Sydney. ABSTRACT: If the mind controls the brain, then there is FREE WILL and its corollaries, dignity and responsibility. You are king in your skull-sized kingdom and the architect of your destiny. If, on the other hand, the brain controls the mind, an incendiary conclusion follows: There can be no FREE WILL, no praise, no punishment and no purgatory. There will be a presentation of the speaker’s novel which, inter alia, is concerned with this question: 21 year in the making this is the first presentation of A River Divided (environmental genre). An eBook version can be found here: https://www.google.com.au/books/edition/A_River_Divided/3eZFEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0 Talk given to The University of Sydney as part of the Sydney Neuroscience And Complexity (SNAC) series: https://www.world-wide.org/Neuro/Sydney-Systems-Neuroscience-and-Complexity-SNAC/

Measuring the degree of consciousness an organism possesses has remained a longstanding challenge in Neuroscience. In part, this is due to the difficulty of finding the appropriate mathematical tools for describing such a subjective phenomenon. Current methods relate the level of consciousness to the complexity of neural activity, i.e., using the information contained in a stream of recorded signals they can tell whether the subject might be awake, asleep, or anaesthetised. Usually, the signals stemming from a complex system are correlated in time; the behaviour of the future depends on the patterns in the neural activity of the past. However these past-future relationships remain either hidden to, or not taken into account in the current measures of consciousness. These past-future correlations are likely to contain more information and thus can reveal a richer understanding about the behaviour of complex systems like a brain. Our work employs the "epsilon-machines” framework to account for the time correlations in neural recordings. In a nutshell, epsilon-machines reveal how much of the past neural activity is needed in order to accurately predict how the activity in the future will behave, and this is summarised in a single number called "statistical complexity". If a lot of past neural activity is required to predict the future behaviour, then can we say that the brain was more “awake" at the time of recording? Furthermore, if we read the recordings in reverse, does the difference between forward and reverse-time statistical complexity allow us to quantify the level of time asymmetry in the brain? Neuroscience predicts that there should be a degree of time asymmetry in the brain. However, this has never been measured. To test this, we used neural recordings measured from the brains of fruit flies and inferred the epsilon-machines. We found that the nature of the past and future correlations of neural activity in the brain, drastically changes depending on whether the fly was awake or anaesthetised. Not only does our study find that wakeful and anaesthetised fly brains are distinguished by how statistically complex they are, but that the amount of correlations in wakeful fly brains was much more sensitive to whether the neural recordings were read forward vs. backwards in time, compared to anaesthetised brains. In other words, wakeful fly brains were more complex, and time asymmetric than anaesthetised ones.

This talk will focus on the generative modelling of resting state time series or endogenous neuronal activity. I will survey developments in modelling distributed neuronal fluctuations – spectral dynamic causal modelling (DCM) for functional MRI – and how this modelling rests upon functional connectivity. The dynamics of brain connectivity has recently attracted a lot of attention among brain mappers. I will also show a novel method to identify dynamic effective connectivity using spectral DCM. Further, I will summarise the development of the next generation of DCMs towards large-scale, whole-brain schemes which are computationally inexpensive, to the other extreme of the development using more sophisticated and biophysically detailed generative models based on the canonical microcircuits.

It is an open question whether preferences for visual art can be lawfully predicted from the basic constituent elements of a visual image. Here, we developed and tested a computational framework to investigate how aesthetic values are formed. We show that it is possible to explain human preferences for a visual art piece based on a mixture of low- and high-level features of the image. Subjective value ratings could be predicted not only within but also across individuals, using a regression model with a common set of interpretable features. We also show that the features predicting aesthetic preference can emerge hierarchically within a deep convolutional neural network trained only for object recognition. Our findings suggest that human preferences for art can be explained at least in part as a systematic integration over the underlying visual features of an image.

The ability to reach, grasp, and manipulate objects is a remarkable expression of motor skill, and the loss of this ability in injury, stroke, or disease can be devastating. These behaviors are controlled by the coordinated activity of tens of millions of neurons distributed across many CNS regions, including the primary motor cortex. While many studies have characterized the activity of single cortical neurons during reaching, the principles governing the dynamics of large, distributed neural populations remain largely unknown. Recent work in primates has suggested that during the execution of reaching, motor cortex may autonomously generate the neural pattern controlling the movement, much like the spinal central pattern generator for locomotion. In this seminar, I will describe recent work that tests this hypothesis using large-scale neural recording, high-resolution behavioral measurements, dynamical systems approaches to data analysis, and optogenetic perturbations in mice. We find, by contrast, that motor cortex requires strong, continuous, and time-varying thalamic input to generate the neural pattern driving reaching. In a second line of work, we demonstrate that the cortico-cerebellar loop is not critical for driving the arm towards the target, but instead fine-tunes movement parameters to enable precise and accurate behavior. Finally, I will describe my future plans to apply these experimental and analytical approaches to the adaptive control of locomotion in complex environments.

Being fundamentally a non-equilibrium process, synchronization comes with unavoidable energy costs and has to be maintained under the constraint of limited resources. Such resource constraints are often reflected as a finite coupling budget available in a network to facilitate interaction and communication. In this talk, I will show that introducing temporal variation in the network structure can lead to efficient synchronization even when stable synchrony is impossible in any static network under the given budget. Our strategy is based on an open-loop control scheme and alludes to a fundamental advantage of temporal networks. Whether this advantage of temporality can be utilized in the brain is an interesting open question.

Dr. Ryan Raut talks to us about some of his recent work on brain states and brain networks, linking them through synchronized traveling waves: https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/sciadv.abf2709 https://www.pnas.org/content/117/34/20890.short This video is part of the SNAC Chat series organized by Mac Shine, Joe Lizier, Ben Fulcher, and Oliver Cliff (The University of Sydney). SNAC Chats are less formal and more interactive than the typical seminars hosted by the Sydney Systems Neuroscience and Complexity (SNAC) group.

Ascending neuromodulatory projections from the locus coeruleus (LC) affect cortical neural networks via the release of norepinephrine (NE). However, the exact nature of these neuromodulatory effects on neural activity patterns in vivo is not well understood. Here we show that in awake monkeys, LC activation is associated with changes in coordinated activity patterns in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). These relationships, which are largely independent of changes in firing rates of individual ACC neurons, depend on the type of LC activation: ACC pairwise correlations tend to be reduced when tonic (baseline) LC activity increases but are enhanced when external events drive phasic LC responses. Both relationships covary with pupil changes that reflect LC activation and arousal. These results suggest that modulations of information processing that reflect changes in coordinated activity patterns in cortical networks can result partly from ongoing, context-dependent, arousal-related changes in activation of the LC-NE system.

Where in the brain consciousness resides remains unclear. It has been suggested that the subnetworks supporting consciousness should be bidirectionally (recurrently) connected because both feed-forward and feedback processing are necessary for conscious experience. Accordingly, evaluating which subnetworks are bidirectionally connected and the strength of these connections would likely aid the identification of regions essential to consciousness. Here, we propose a method for hierarchically decomposing a network into cores with different strengths of bidirectional connection, as a means of revealing the structure of the complex brain network. We applied the method to a whole-brain mouse connectome. We found that cores with strong bidirectional connections consisted of regions presumably essential to consciousness (e.g., the isocortical and thalamic regions, and claustrum) and did not include regions presumably irrelevant to consciousness (e.g., cerebellum). Contrarily, we could not find such correspondence between cores and consciousness when we applied other simple methods which ignored bidirectionality. These findings suggest that our method provides a novel insight into the relation between bidirectional brain network structures and consciousness. Our recent preprint on this work is here: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.12.452022

Networks are widely used as mathematical models of complex systems across many scientific disciplines, and in particular within neuroscience. In this talk, we introduce two aspects of our collaborative research: (1) machine learning and networks, and (2) graph dimensionality. Machine learning and networks. Decades of work have produced a vast corpus of research characterising the topological, combinatorial, statistical and spectral properties of graphs. Each graph property can be thought of as a feature that captures important (and sometimes overlapping) characteristics of a network. We have developed hcga, a framework for highly comparative analysis of graph data sets that computes several thousands of graph features from any given network. Taking inspiration from hctsa, hcga offers a suite of statistical learning and data analysis tools for automated identification and selection of important and interpretable features underpinning the characterisation of graph data sets. We show that hcga outperforms other methodologies (including deep learning) on supervised classification tasks on benchmark data sets whilst retaining the interpretability of network features, which we exemplify on a dataset of neuronal morphologies images. Graph dimensionality. Dimension is a fundamental property of objects and the space in which they are embedded. Yet ideal notions of dimension, as in Euclidean spaces, do not always translate to physical spaces, which can be constrained by boundaries and distorted by inhomogeneities, or to intrinsically discrete systems such as networks. Deviating from approaches based on fractals, here, we present a new framework to define intrinsic notions of dimension on networks, the relative, local and global dimension. We showcase our method on various physical systems.

Neurological disorders share common high-level alterations, such as cognitive deficits, anxiety, and depression. This raises the possibility of fundamental alterations in the way information conveyed by neural firing is maintained and dispatched in the diseased brain. Using experimental epilepsy as a model of neurological disorder we tested the hypothesis of altered information processing, analyzing how neurons in the hippocampus and the entorhinal cortex store and exchange information during slow and theta oscillations. We equate the storage and sharing of information to low level, or primitive, information processing at the algorithmic level, the theoretical intermediate level between structure and function. We find that these low-level processes are organized into substates during brain states marked by theta and slow oscillations. Their internal composition and organization through time are disrupted in epilepsy, losing brain state-specificity, and shifting towards a regime of disorder in a brain region dependent manner. We propose that the alteration of information processing at an algorithmic level may be a mechanism behind the emergent and widespread co-morbidities associated with epilepsy, and perhaps other disorders.

Large-scale, single neuron resolution recordings are inherently high-dimensional, with as many dimensions as neurons. To make sense of them, for many the answer is: reduce the number of dimensions. In this talk I argue we can distinguish weak and strong principles of neural dimension reduction. The weak principle is that dimension reduction is a convenient tool for making sense of complex neural data. The strong principle is that dimension reduction moves us closer to how neural circuits actually operate and compute. Elucidating these principles is crucial, for which we subscribe to provides radically different interpretations of the same dimension reduction techniques applied to the same data. I outline experimental evidence for each principle, but illustrate how we could make either the weak or strong principles appear to be true based on innocuous looking analysis decisions. These insights suggest arguments over low and high-dimensional neural activity need better constraints from both experiment and theory.

Von Economo stated that an "Ideal Cortical Map" would look very different to a parcellation. He suggested that an Ideal Cortical Map would involve the superimposition of many different cortical maps, with changes in each map shown at every single point. In line with this idea, I will discuss our recent research on identifying principal dimensions of cortical differentiation. In particular, I will highlight large-scale patterns of cytoarchitectural differentiation that can be observed using post mortem histology or in vivo microstructure-sensitive MRI. I aim to show how this approach provides a cohesive framework to understand cortical organisation across multiple biological scales. This allows us to formulate new ideas on the organisation and function of the brain regions (eg: mesiotemporal lobe), networks (eg: DMN) and the whole cortex.

In my talk I will discuss the concept of a cognitive ontology, which defines the parts of the mind that psychologists and neuroscientsts aim to study. I will discuss the way in which ontologies have traditionally been defined, and then discuss ways in which ontology might be reconsidered in the context of computational approaches to cognition.

Functions of the neocortex depend on its bidirectional communication with the thalamus, via cortico-thalamo-cortical (CTC) loops. Recent work dissecting the synaptic connectivity in these loops is generating a clearer picture of their cellular organization. Here, we review findings across sensory, motor and cognitive areas, focusing on patterns of cell type-specific synaptic connections between the major types of cortical and thalamic neurons. We outline simple and complex CTC loops, and note features of these loops that appear to be general versus specialized. CTC loops are tightly interlinked with local cortical and corticocortical (CC) circuits, forming extended chains of loops that are probably critical for communication across hierarchically organized cerebral networks. Such CTC–CC loop chains appear to constitute a modular unit of organization, serving as scaffolding for area-specific structural and functional modifications. Inhibitory neurons and circuits are embedded throughout CTC loops, shaping the flow of excitation. We consider recent findings in the context of established CTC and CC circuit models, and highlight current efforts to pinpoint cell type-specific mechanisms in CTC loops involved in consciousness and perception. As pieces of the connectivity puzzle fall increasingly into place, this knowledge can guide further efforts to understand structure–function relationships in CTC loops.

Emily Finn is an Assistant Professor at Dartmouth where she leads the Functional Imaging & Naturalistic Neuroscience (FINN) lab (https://thefinnlab.github.io/).

The human brain is a complex system exhibiting multi-scale spatiotemporal organization. In this talk, I will provide an overview of my lab’s work on large-scale functional network organization across different timescales. First, I will present a biophysically plausible model of second-level fluctuation in the brain’s functional connectivity patterns. I will then discuss how minute-level task-state changes can predict behavioral traits. This is followed by exploring how brain dynamics can vary over the course of a day. Finally, I will discuss our work on estimating individual-level network markers that are stable across weeks and months.

Neurons in the globus pallidus fire continuously, even in the absence of any synaptic input. We are accustomed to think that neurons fire action potentials only when stimulated by some specific pattern of inputs, and this allows us to attribute some meaning to their activity. In the globus pallidus (and several other autonomously firing basal ganglia structures) the occurrence of an action potential is a foregone conclusion and does not necessarily mean anything. Instead, synaptic input modifies the timing of action potentials in these neurons. In the absence of a time standard, how can a neuron receiving input from a globus pallidus neuron detect that the timing of its pallidal input has been changed, and change its response accordingly?

Networks (connectivity) and dynamics are two key pillars of network neuroscience – an emerging field dedicated to understanding structure and function of neural systems across scales, from neurons to circuits to the whole brain. In this presentation I will review current themes and future directions, including structure/function relationships, use of computational models to map information flow and communication dynamics, and a novel edge-centric approach to map functional connectivity at fine temporal scales. I will argue that network neuroscience represents a promising theoretical framework for understanding the complex structure and functioning of nervous systems.